Details

THE GRANGER CAUSALITY TESTS ON THE IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NIGERIA

LAWAL, A.S

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The Federal Polytechnic, Bauchi, Nigeria

RAPHEAL NENLAT

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The Federal Polytechnic, Bauchi, Nigeria

JACOB, H.U

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The Federal Polytechnic, Bauchi, Nigeria

126-134

Vol: 5, Issue: 4, 2015

Receiving Date: 2015-09-08 Acceptance Date:

2015-10-05

Publication Date:

2015-11-11

Download PDF

Abstract

In the last decade, Nigeria economy has metamorphosed from the level of millions of naira to billions of naira and postulating into trillions of naira on the expenditure side of the budget This study is to examine the impact of government expenditure on economic growth in Nigeria. Using annual data of total government expenditure and gross domestic product from 1977 to 2012. The econometrics employed was the unit root, co-integration and the granger causality test. Firstly from the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test, Agriculture Expenditure, Defence expenditure, Education Expenditure, Health Expenditure and Transport and Communication expenditure are non-stationary at zero level, and later became stationary at first difference. Secondly the co-integration test shows that there is no co-integration (or long run) relationship between government expenditure and economic growth. Thirdly in the Granger causality test it was found that the total government expenditure on Agriculture has a significant effect on gross domestic product (GDP), it also found that the total government expenditure on Defence (security), Transport and communication has a positive impact on economic growth in Nigeria.

Keywords: Government Expenditure, Economic Growth, Recurrent Expenditure, Capital Expenditure, Co-integration

References

  1. Abu, N and Abdullahi, U. (2010). Government Expenditure and Economic Growth in Nigeria, 1970-2008: A Disaggregated Analysis, Business and Economics Journal, Volume 2010: BEJ-4: Pg. 1-11.
  2. Ergun, D and Tuck, C. (2006). Government Expenditure and National Income: Causality Tests for Five South East Asian Countries, International Business and Research Journal Vol.5, No,10: Pg. 49-58.
  3. Ford, L (1997). Economic Development, Financial Development and Liberalization: Taiwan, 1960-1995, Discussion papers of the University of Birmingham, Pg. 97-25.
  4. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric models and Crossspectral Methods, Econometrica, Vol. 37, July: 42438.
  5. Greene,W.(2003), Econometric Analysis, 3th edition, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
  6. Gujarati, D (2004). Essentials of Econometrics, 4th ed., McGraw Hill, New York.
  7. Jamshaid, R, Iqbal, A. and Siddiqi, M. (2010). Cointegration-Causality Analysis between Public Expenditures and Economic Growth in Pakistan, European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.13, No 4: Pg 556-565.
  8. Johanson, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Co-integrating Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12: Pg. 231-254.
  9. Johanson, S and K, Joselius (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics andStatistics, 52: Pg. 169-210.
  10. John, L and George, V (2005), Government Expenditure and Economic Growth: Evidence from TrivariateCausality Testing, Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. VIII, No. 1: Pg. 125- 152.
  11. Keynes, J. (1936), General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.
  12. Muhlis, B and Hakan C. (2003), Causality between Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: The Turkish Case, Journal of Economic and Social Research 6 (1): Pg. 53-72. P.G. Michaelides, National Technical University of Athens © 2012 Kindly hosted on-line: http://users.ntua.gr/jea
  13. Olugbenga and Owoye (2007), Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: New Evidence from OECD Countries[http://iaes.confex.com/iaes/Rome_67/techprogram/S1888.HTM]
  14. Omoke P. (2009), Government Expenditure and National Income: A Causality Test for Nigeria, European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, Vo. 2: Pg. 1-11.
  15. Oxley, L. (1994), Cointegration, Causality and Wagner's Law: A Test for Britain 1870-1913, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 41, 286298
  16. Peacock, A. and Wiseman, J. (1961), The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  17. Singh and Sahni (1984), Causality between Public Expenditure and National Income, The Review of Economics and Statistics 66, Pg. 630-644.
  18. Toda H. and Yamamoto T. (1995), Statistical Inference in Vector Auto regressions with Possibly Integrated Processes, Journal of Econometrics, 66 (1-2): Pg. 225-250.
  19. Wagner A. (1883), Three Extracts on Public Finance, translated and reprinted in R.A.Musgrave and A.T. Peacock (Eds), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London: Macmillan (1958).
Back

Disclaimer: All papers published in IJRST will be indexed on Google Search Engine as per their policy.

We are one of the best in the field of watches and we take care of the needs of our customers and produce replica watches of very good quality as per their demands.