Details

AN ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO ONTOLOGY MAPPING

Meenakshi Rana

Department of Computer Science & Engineering, KEC Ghaziabad

Ashish Punya

Department of Computer Science & Engineering, KEC Ghaziabad

191-203

Vol: 5, Issue: 3, 2015

Receiving Date: 2014-06-25 Acceptance Date:

2015-07-27

Publication Date:

2015-08-28

Download PDF

Abstract

Ontology mapping is the key to data interoperability in the semantic web vision. Computing mappings is the first step to applications such as query rewriting, instance sharing, web-service integration, and ontology merging. This problem has received a lot of attention in recent years, but little is known about how users actually construct mappings. Several ontology-mapping tools have been developed, but which tools do users actually use? What processes are users following to discover, track, and compute mappings? How do teams coordinate when performing mappings? In this paper, we discuss the results from an online user survey where we gathered feedback from the community to help answer these important questions. We discuss the results from the survey and the implications they may have on the mapping research community. Most existing ontology mapping tools do not provide exact mappings. Rather, there is usually some degree of uncertainty. We describe a framework to improve existing ontology mappings using a Bayesian Network. Omen, an Ontology Mapping ENhancer uses a set of meta-rules that capture the influence of the ontology structure and the semantics of ontology relations and matches nodes that are neighbours of already matched nodes in the two ontologies. We have implemented a prototype ontology matcher that can enhance existing matches between ontology concepts. Preliminary experiments demonstrate that Omen successfully identifies and enhances ontology mappings.

Keywords: community; heterogeneous ; mappings ; neighbourhood

References

  1. H.-H. Do. Schema Matching and Mapping-based Data Integration. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Universit¨at Leipzig, 2006.
  2. S. M. Falconer, N. F. Noy, and M.-A. Storey. Towards understanding the needs of cognitive support for ontology mapping. In Ontology Matching Workshop, 2006.
  3. S. M. Falconer and M.-A. Storey. Cognitive support for human-guided mapping systems. Technical Report DCS-318-IR, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2007.
  4. P. Lambrix and A. Edberg. Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. In Proceedings Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pages 589–600, Kauai, Hawaii, USA, 2003.
  5. J. Lomax and A. T. McCray. Mapping the gene ontology into the unified medical language system: Research papers. Comp. Funct. Genomics, 5(4):354–361, 2004.
  6. J. L¨owgren. Human-computer Interaction. What every system developer should know. Studentlitteratur, Lund, 1993.
  7. D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. The chimaera ontology environment. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 1123–1124, 2000.
  8. Z. Ding and Y. Peng. A probabilistic extension to ontology language owl. In 37th Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences (HICSS-37), Big Island, Hawai, 2004.
  9. A. Doan, J. Madhavan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web. In The Eleventh International WWW Conference, Hawaii, US, 2002.
  10. J. Euzenat and P. Valtchev. Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite. In The 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-04), Valencia, Spain, 2004.
Back

Disclaimer: All papers published in IJRST will be indexed on Google Search Engine as per their policy.

We are one of the best in the field of watches and we take care of the needs of our customers and produce replica watches of very good quality as per their demands.