Details

ROLE OF OTHER NON-BT GENES IN MANAGING RESISTANCE TO BT CROPS

Preeti

Research Scholar, Monad University, Hapur, Ghaziabad (U.P.)

Dr. Akhilesh Kumar

Assistant Professor, Govt. PG college, Narnaul

54-59

Vol: 3, Issue: 3, 2013

Receiving Date: Acceptance Date:

Publication Date:

Download PDF

Abstract

Using the diamondback moth/Bt broccoli system as a model, we have investigated aspects important to the long-term deployment of this novel technology. Although the diamondback moth/Bt broccoli system may not exactly duplicate the currently available insect/Bt crop systems such as crops like corn, and potatoes, it can help identify areas for further work. Concurrently with more field studies conducted to refine the presently utilized recommendations, industry, public sector scientists, and farmers must work together to develop a second generation of technology and implementation strategies to ensure the even longer term durability of Bt-transgenic plants. Within the plant showed that toxin expression is fairly uniform throughout the plant when the plant is in its vegetative stage17. We used cytoplasmic male sterile transgenic plants hemizygous for the cry1A(c) gene for field tests. Additional treatments were included for reference to reflect native diamondback moth populations and were 0% refuge and 100% refuge with no insect release in either (one replicate each). Counts of larvae (all stages) were taken at five periods over the season beginning on 1 July and ending on 12 September. Leaf-dip bioassays with Javelin WG (Bt var. kurstaki; Novartis) to evaluate resistance were done with progeny of the released larvae (time zero) and with progeny of larvae counted in the final collection.

Keywords: Deployment, recommendations, industry, public sector

References

  1. Brent, R. Cell, 2000.
  2. Cooper, N. G., the Human Genome Project. Deciphering the Blue print of heredity. University science book. Mill Velly California, 1994.
  3. De Risi,J.L.Iyer. V.R. and Brown, P.O. Science 1997.
  4. Goffeau, A. et.al. Science 1996.
  5. Lander, E.S. Science 1996.
  6. Oliver, S.G. et.al. Nature 1992.
  7. Rounsley, S. and Briggs S. Current opinion on Plant Biol.1999.
  8. Rebbeck CA, Leroi AM, Burt A (2011) Mitochondrial capture by a transmissible cancer. Science, 331–303.
  9. Smith RL, Sytsma KJ (1990) Evolution of Populus nigra (sect. Aigeiros): Introgressive hybridization and the chloroplast contribution of Populus alba (sect. Populus) Am J Bot 77:1176–1187.
  10. Cross RefWeb of Science Rieseberg LH, Soltis DE (1991) Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol Trends Plants 5:65–84.
  11. Acosta MC, Premoli AC (2010) Evidence of chloroplast capture in South American Nothofagus (subgenus Nothofagus, Nothofagaceae) Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:235–242.
  12. Tsitrone A, Kirkpatrick M, Levin DA (2003) A model for chloroplast capture. Evolution 57:1776–1782.MedlineWeb of Science
  13. Keeling PJ, Palmer JD (2008) Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution. Nat Rev Genet 9:605–618.CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
  14. Keeling PJ (2009) Functional and ecological impacts of horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes.
  15. Curr Opin Genet Dev 19:613–619. (2010) the give-and-take of DNA: Horizontal gene transfer in plants. Trends Plant Sci 15:11–22.
  16. Bergthorsson U, Adams KL, Thomason B, Palmer JD (2003) widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants. Nature 424:197–201.
  17. Won H, Renner SS (2003) Horizontal gene transfer from flowering plants to Gnetum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10824–10829
Back

Disclaimer: Indexing of published papers is subject to the evaluation and acceptance criteria of the respective indexing agencies. While we strive to maintain high academic and editorial standards, International Journal of Research in Science and Technology does not guarantee the indexing of any published paper. Acceptance and inclusion in indexing databases are determined by the quality, originality, and relevance of the paper, and are at the sole discretion of the indexing bodies.